Feed on
Posts
Comments

The 1951 film production of A Streetcar Named Desire shifted the focus of the story even further onto Blanche than the original play. Both versions portray Blanche as the protagonist, but the movie made her the star of the show right from the beginning by changing the first scene.

In Tennessee Williams’ play, the first characters the audience sees are the neighbors Eunice and an unnamed black woman, who sit on the steps outside. Stanley and Mitch come around the corner, and Stanley delivers the first piece of dialogue. He hollers to Stella, who comes outside and tells him not to yell in that manner at her. The following action sets the tone for Stanley and Stella’s relationship; Stanley throws a package of meat from the butcher’s at Stella, telling her to “Catch!” Stella catches it and laughs, but Stanley and Mitch are already heading back around the corner. When Stella calls after Stanley to ask if she can join them, his response is “Come on.”

I find the action of Stanley essentially chucking this package at Stella a little humorous because of its absurdity. The play has just started and here is this man we don’t know yet who hollers at his wife then, as the play puts it, “heaves” this meat at her. However, this interaction also shows how little respect Stanley has for Stella. He could not have been bothered to take a few more steps to give it to her, and after she’s caught the package he’s already on his way out. Additionally, Stella doesn’t mind this treatment. She acts as if it was some sort of joke. Stanley also doesn’t seem to wait up for her when it’s decided that she’s coming to watch him bowl. He continues on with hardly a second thought for her. This lays out an introduction to their relationship for the audience. Stanley disrespects Stella, and Stella reacts positively toward it. This is explored later with Stella thinking Stanley’s destructive outbursts are exciting.

It is not until after a short conversation between Eunice and the unnamed woman on the steps that Blanche makes her first appearance. This is in stark contrast to the movie, which opens directly with Blanche at a train station on her way to the Kowalski’s. The audience follows her journey to her sister’s, then to the bowling alley where she finds Stella. Opening on Blanche makes her feel more important, like she’s the one to pay the most attention to. Additionally, cutting the scene with the meat falls in line with the movie’s ending, in which Stella leaves Stanley and moves out. But the beginning is a very powerful part of a story, and dedicating the entire opening scene to Blanche gives her the spotlight, while the original beginning shines light on Stella and Stanley’s relationship.

There were other changes to the story, but this once stuck out to me because I felt like it deeply affects how the audience views the characters. Blanche is still the protagonist in William’s version, but that fact is much more prominent in the movie. In fact, Blanche seemed to get more screen time throughout the story in the movie than she did in the play, and it all started with the beginning.

In any adaptation, there are obviously going to be differences from one form to the other. A Streetcar Named Desire is no different. There are many differences, both big and small, but the one that stood out to me was the change in Mitch’s attitude toward Blanche in the end. This could just be the adjustment of watching it acted out instead of reading the dialogue and stage directions, but during the confrontation between the two, Mitch seems much angrier. He kicks open the door, yells, rips the lantern off of the bulb, and drags Blanche into its light to see her clearly. In the play, while he was still upset, it didn’t read like the dark anger seen in the movie.

Another difference in Mitch I noticed has to do with a part of a scene that’s unique to the movie. In the last scene, when they’re taking Blanche away to the institution, he yells at Stanley “You did this to her!” and swings on him. There’s no scene like this in the play. In the final scene of the play, Mitch isn’t even mentioned by name. He is only a part of the poker players collective, giving the feeling of indifference at her being dragged away. It seems in the play that he doesn’t know about the assault, or at the very least, doesn’t care. I find the difference in his presentation very interesting. Could his attitude change be an appeasement of the moviegoers, like the ending of the movie?

The differences between the play and film version of “A Streetcar Named Desire”, effect the way the reader interprets each. In the beginning of the book, Blanche arrives at her sister’s apartment where Stella and Stanley’s neighbor, Eunice, confirms she is in the right place. In the movie, a sailor directs Blanche to where she is supposed to go. Not only this but Blanche and Stella reunite at the bowling alley, not at their apartment. Another difference between the play and the film is the mentioning of Alan, Blanche’s ex husband. Not once in the film does it mention Alan being found with another man where in the play, this is a key detail. One of the final main differences between the play and film version of “A Streetcat Named Desire”, is the ending. At the ending of the film, Stella tells Stanley to never touch her again, followed by her running off with the baby and leaving him. This does not happen in the play, in fact, Stella returns to Stanley and remains with him in the play version. Overall, the play incorporates a lot more details that is left out in the film. The film is extremely fast paced and makes it difficult to understand all of the dialogue that is included. The film is straight to the point, resulting in a lot of details and dialogue left out compared to the play version. Despite there being minimal and maximal changes, the loss of key details from the play and the movie caused me to interpret these two pieces completely different.

The Movie vs The Book

When watching the movie A Streetcar Named Desire, one must compare the differences between the movie and its original source material. There are only a few major differences between the two, but there are also smaller differences that are quite noticeable to those who read the play in depth. There are tiny differences all throughout the movie which makes one wonder why these changes were put into place.

In the beginning of the original play, written by Tennessee Williams, the protagonist, Blanche Dubois is in New Orleans looking for her sister, Stella Dubois, and her home in the French Quarter. Blanche is definitely out of her comfort zone and someone helps her out. In the original play, Blanche arrives on the doorstep of her sister’s home, but doesn’t seem to believe that it was the right place. Eunice, Stella’s neighbor and friend, sees Blanche and lets her know that she is in the right place. However, in the movie, Blanche has not arrived yet to her sister’s place and gets help from a young man. This seems like an intentional change because it reflects on Blanche’s past and how she messed around with young boys in her hometown. 

Another difference between the movie and the original play is how they mention people of color. In the play, Blanche is clearly racist and disapproves of how her sister is around so many black people and even in the beginning calls one black person the n word. There is also another point in the play when Blanche expresses how a “colored girl” should be helping Stella out in the household. In the movie, there is no mention of Blanche’s distaste for the people of color around her. In the movie, they are truly invisible while in the play they are talked about as low lives. This makes one question why the movie changed something about Blanche’s character. A possible answer to this question is the time period in which this movie was made. This movie was released in 1951 and during that time, segregation was in full swing. It could be possible that this had an effect on the actual movie. Another reason might be that the actress who played Blanche, Vivien Leigh, refused to be a part of a movie that discriminated against people of color, but that might just be wishful thinking. 

I also saw that the movie had changed some of the scenes that were in the original play. For example, when Blanche first arrives at Stella’s house, she waits for her there, but in the movie Blanche goes over to the bowling alley that Stella is at. Blanche and Stella were at a cafe when talking for the first time but I thought that they were in Stella’s apartment when I read the play. I noticed also that Blanche always seemed to be in the spotlight whenever around Mitch which was somewhat different from the book because Blanche always hid herself from him. This could be because it was a movie and they had to make the actress look good. 

These little differences added up for me, and even though the base of the story is there, I feel as though I ingested two different pieces of media rather than one work. I believe that these changes were put in place to make it feel like something new and make it separate from the play. This could have been a cash grab for the movie industry because the play was already being performed so they had to make it different in some aspects. 

The differences between the play and movie by the same name, “A Streetcar Named Desire”, provide drastic and deep differences in the interpretation of the story, particularly that of the ending. The play has the ending in which Stanley and Stella reconcile, leaving Stanley forgiven and unpunished in his crimes against Stella’s sister, Blanche. In the movie, Stella takes their son, says “Don’t ever touch me again”, and runs from Stanley’s calling for her to the safely of Eunice, their upstairs neighbor. This drawls a parallel between this scene and when Stanley beats Stella, but she returns to him at the start of the movie. The faster paced, and more expressive movie allows the audience to have a closer view into the emotional aspects of the story through the body language and expressions of the actors, in comparison to the internal monologues written into the stage cues of the play itself. This contrast allows readers of the story to sit and think over individual lines, while viewers of the movie watch scenes occur in real time, watching the nuanced expressions of the actors. This in turn can allow for different interpretations of the story, like that of the dramatic responses of Blanche’s theatrics being more apparent in the movie rather than the written play. This difference in body language is also expressed in the clothing of the characters and the use of the outfits worn to tell the stories of the characters. Such as the extravagant dresses of Blanche, being much more noticeable and odd compared to those of Stella in the movie. These subtle tells and differences (and sometimes not so subtle) allow for both a deeper view into the differences of the characters, as well as allowing for interpretations of the story to shift closer with the times in which the story is portrayed along with those who portray it.

I think it would be interesting to create visual art pieces of my hometown, Grand Rapids. I would further research the city, history, and origin and incorporate my research into my piece. I specifically want to focus on the origin of Grand Rapids and how it got its name.

This chapter begins with Edna being unable to sleep. It mentions that everyone else is either still asleep or only awake because they are attending church. A passage from the chapter that stood out to me states, “the air was invigorating and steadied somewhat her faculties. However, she was not seeking refreshment or help from any source, either external or from within. She was blindly following whatever impulse moved her, as if she had placed herself in alien hands for direction, and freed her soul of responsibility.” I liked this passage because it is implying that Edna is starting to let herself enjoy life and set herself free from her “societal norm responsibilities.” Continuing on in the chapter, Edna requests that a servant girl go to wake up Robert, something she had never done before. As soon as Robert is awake, a boat is waiting for both him and Edna to take them to the Cheniere for mass. Throughout the chapter, new characters are introduced, as well as returning characters brought back. One of which being the lady in black, continuing to count her beads. Along with the lady in black, a girl by the name of Mariequita is introduced. It seems as if Robert and Mariequira were once romantically involved with each other. Robert and Mariequira talk little on the boat and Robert invites Edna to go to Grand Terre. She accepts, and states that “she would like to be alone there [Grande Terre] with Robert, in the sun, listening to the ocean’s roar and watching the slimy lizards writhe in and out among the ruins of the old fort.” The chapter ends with Robert and Edna walking up to the church, the sailor Beaudelet remaining at the boat, and Mariequita walking away and shooting a look at Robert out of the corner of her eye. 

 

In A Streetcar Named Desire we have the central conflict between Blanche and Stanley but to have them crossover we have to have a commonality between the two, which gives us Stella. Stella is Stanley’s wife and Blanche’s sister. When Blanche arrives in Stella’s New Orleans apartment off of The Streetcar Named Desire we see that Blanche lost the Belle Reve and now has nowhere to go and needs a roof over her head so she puts herself unknowingly on Stella. We do see however that in a way Blanche blames Stella for the loss of Belle Reve because, in Blanche’s eyes, Stella abandoned her for this awful life in New Orleans. Stella seems to be on her tip-toes when it comes to Blanche, especially when it comes to asking questions, I think this may be because Stella knows about Blanche’s delusional past and mental issues. We also see through Stella that she has a sense of peace in the conflict because she understands both sides, the sophisticated side and the blue-collar side, which seemingly dulls the conflict for at least a little bit. We that Stella is the reasoning in a way for this conflict also because Blanche is trying her damndest to get Stella away from Stanley in any way possible, but mainly by belittling him, then it turns into trying physically to get Stella away after Stanley hits her drunk at a poker game. Stella is seen as the pawn in the chess game between the two which is why in my opinion she went into labor after the fight over the bus ticket at the birthday party.

Stella herself is a strong character even though she never seems to have a definitive plan of action. She seems to be able to handle both Stanley and Blanche well, especially in Blanche’s hectic moments with her clear sense of being able to handle her delusional moments. She never agrees with either one of the badgering from either her sister or her husband and only breaks down fully when Blanche gets escorted to the psychiatric ward. Like we said in class I wouldn’t think of Stella as the main protagonist but I did root for her to get out of her marriage with Stanley and live and happy life with her baby.

Project presentation 1

I would really like to research the food of New Orleans. I would like to look into the origins of some of their most notorious foods like gumbo and beignets and why they are so meaningful to their culture.  I am unsure how I would portray this creatively aside from potentially creating a cook book.

 

My idea is to create a map of my town and highlight the landmarks that are important to me when navigating, as I don’t often use actual street signs to get from place to place, but rather inconspicuous landmarks with very little meaning to others. For example: turn right before THE brown house to get the other marina (with the good fishing poles). I think it could be an interesting commentary of what I personally think is important and what I personally look at as I navigate the space.

Research Project #1

Idea #1

For my research project, I am thinking about looking into the politics behind Hurricane Katrina. Basically, I would like to explore the disaster policies that were in place at the time and see how they were executed when it came to Katrina. I would also like to look at how disaster policies changed in the U.S.  after Hurricane Katrina and what measurements LA took to protect itself from another disaster. For the creative aspect of this project, I think it would be interesting if I crocheted an image of something symbolic to New Orleans to show how they carried through the disaster. 

 

Idea #2

Another idea for my research project would be to research Marie Laveau and distinguish between fact and myth. I would explain what her life actually was like and how her myth came to be. I also think it would be interesting to see her impact on the culture in New Orleans. For the creative aspect, I think I would like to make something that demonstrates a part of her real life rather than the myth. I was thinking about drawing this idea.

Final Project Ideas

I’m not entirely sure what I want to do for the final project. At least, I don’t know what I could do creatively. I have two ideas for the research part of it, though I don’t know which I’d want to do. Learning more about the history of New Orleans cemeteries and how the influences of French, Spanish, and African burial practices combined to influence the modern day mourning and funeral traditions of the city would be very interesting to me, but I’m not sure what I could do creatively. Another option could be comparing Hurricane Camille in 1969 and its affect on my hometown of Nelson County with Hurricane Katrina and its affect on New Orleans, or just sharing about Camille. While Camille was no where near as destructive as Katrina by any means, the 1969 hurricane has always been talked about in my life, both from family members who remember going through it and the recent 50th anniversary of remembrance. It would be interesting to share it with others.

I’d like to write a lyric essay about different aspects of Gloucester, Virginia’s culture. I hope to cover subjects like the annual Daffodil Festival, Beaver Dam Park, and the movie theater I patronized in my youth, which closed in recent years. My plan is to write just enough about each essential aspect of Gloucester County to give the reader a glimpse of them, and then compile all of these snapshots into one comprehensive work. My goal is to offer a unique look at the county that can’t be seen through a Wikipedia page.

I hope to find similar works about New Orleans to aid me with my piece’s structure and composition. Seeing what inspires others to write about a place, as well as what within their works speaks to me, will help me decide what to include or leave out in my project. Poetry and creative nonfiction will be particularly useful because a lyric essay combines, as the name suggests, lyrical and essayic writing.

I have two ideas for a final project but I can not pick one for certain. I was thinking about the capitalization of graveyards in New Orleans with the tours through them, I was thinking about writing the voices of different spirits and how depending on their status in life (rich and poor) and what I think they could feel about strangers walking through where their families are supposed to honor and mourn them. I was also thinking about voodoo and how what it was originally is not how it is revered now in media and other forms of publication, I was thinking creatively I could write about a time traveler/tourist in Marie Laveau’s time investigating the true basis of voodoo and what it was then.

 

Throughout the novel, Edna has been challenging traditional gender roles and exploring her own desires and passions. However, in this chapter, she is confronted with the harsh reality that her choices have not only alienated her from society but also from those closest to her. Her husband, Leonce Pontellier, expresses his disappointment and disapproval of Edna’s behavior, leaving her feeling isolated and misunderstood.

Furthermore, Edna’s close friend Adele Ratignolle also distances herself from Edna due to their differing views on womanhood. Adele represents the ideal Victorian woman who embraces motherhood and domesticity, while Edna rejects these roles in favor of personal freedom. This contrast highlights the tension between societal expectations and individual desires.

As Edna grapples with these consequences, she begins to question whether her pursuit of independence is worth sacrificing relationships and social acceptance. She experiences a sense of disillusionment as she realizes that true freedom comes at a cost.

Chopin uses symbolism throughout this chapter to convey Edna’s internal struggle. The sea serves as a metaphor for both liberation and entrapment. While it initially represents freedom for Edna, it also becomes a symbol of isolation as she realizes that true independence may mean being alone.

In conclusion, Chapter 21 of “The Awakening” showcases Edna Pontellier’s realization that personal freedom often comes at a price. Through conflicts with society’s expectations and strained relationships with loved ones, Chopin explores themes of identity, gender roles, and societal constraints. This chapter serves as a pivotal moment in Edna’s journey towards self-discovery, leaving readers questioning the true cost of liberation.

Chapter 20 of “The Awakening” by Kate Chopin is a pivotal moment in the novel, as it showcases the protagonist Edna Pontellier’s transformation and rebellion against societal norms. In this chapter, Edna attends a party at her friend Madame Ratignolle’s house, where she experiences a newfound sense of freedom and self-expression.

One passage that particularly stood out to me is when Edna dances passionately with Robert Lebrun. The narrator describes their dance as “a revelation,” highlighting the intense connection between them (Chopin 143). This passage signifies Edna’s awakening to her own desires and emotions. Through this dance, she breaks free from the constraints of her marriage and society’s expectations for women.

This scene also symbolizes Edna’s defiance against societal norms. As she dances with Robert, they become oblivious to their surroundings, suggesting that they are transcending societal boundaries together. The narrator further emphasizes this by stating that “the touch of his lips upon her hand was like a pleasing sting” (Chopin 143). This quote conveys the electrifying sensation that Edna feels when she defies societal conventions.

Although their dance represents liberation and passion in the moment, it ultimately leads to heartbreak for both characters. This highlights the consequences of challenging societal norms and pursuing personal desires.

The Awakening

“The Awakening” by Kate Chopin is a reflection the 19th century and the struggles women of the time faced, both externally within society, and internally, with their roles in a family system. This novel shows how much men and the standing within society took control of women’s lives and happiness.
The following quote from Mr. Pontellier help to reflect the ideals of the time, “When Mr. Pontellier learned of his wife’s intention to abandon her home and take up her residence elsewhere, he immediately wrote her a letter of unqualified disapproval and remonstrance. She had given reasons which her was unwilling to acknowledge as adequate. He hoped she had not acted upon her rash impulse; and he begged her to consider first, foremost, and above all else, what people would say.” These words from Mr. Pontellier’s point of view reflect his wife Edna as rash, impulsive, and out of his control, while also making him look bad. His first concern was not with why his wife left, but in saving face within the community.
Throughout the novel, women are depicted as senseless, reckless, and below people, only good for making a good home and tending the children. This is in contrast to the idealism Enda Pontellier discovers within the community of women who are independent thinkers. When she tries to integrate her newfound independence into her life, she is repeatedly told by both her husband and the society they live in to go home and spend her husband’s money.
For instance, the quotes “I’ve heard she is partially demented” and ” I’m told she’s extremely disagreeable and unpleasant,” in refence to one of Mrs. Pontellier’s friends, Mademoiselle Reisz, who spoke in metaphors of women finding freedom. The men, in a farewell dinner, express that a woman whom they find disagreeable is crazy, unpleasant, and incomprehensible in speaking out for women’s independence and freedom.
In the end, Edna’s quest for free thought and independence leads her to tsking a swim, as reflected in her previous swimming explorations and fears to swim “where no women had swum before”, where she begins to hear the sounds of those long since passed, and it is assumed she drowns in her quest for independent both from her husband, and the oppressive society she is in.

Chapter 14 explores the complexities of Edna’s emotions and her struggle to define her own desires and identity. She begins to question societal norms and expectations, particularly those related to marriage and motherhood, even more so than in other chapters. Edna’s interactions with Robert become more passionate, but they are also marked by a sense of longing and unfulfilled desire that pains Edna. 

 

Throughout Chapter 14, Edna’s internal conflict deepens as she grapples with her growing feelings for Robert and her desire for personal autonomy. This chapter is a pivotal moment in Edna’s journey as she begins to challenge the roles and constraints placed upon her as a woman in the late 19th century.



In chapter XIX of The Awakening by Kate Chopin, Edna Pontellier begins to abandon her duties as a housewife in favor of allowing her emotions and caprices to guide her. She feels she acted foolishly by attempting to crush her wedding ring and smashing the vase. Deciding to follow her feelings as they come prevents them from building up and resulting in another overflow of emotion.

Mr. Pontellier is angered by Edna’s refusal to play housewife, and voices his disapproval. However, “[w]hen Mr. Pontellier became rude, Enda grew insolent,” (131). This reminded me of one of the first times Edna refused to submit to her husband back in chapter XI, when she stayed outside all night instead of coming into the house. Edna told him then to not speak rudely to her because she would not answer him, and it seems she is sticking to her word. Her insolence later in the book provides an opportunity for the reader to see how much she has changed, because abandoning her entire role as a housewife is much more serious than deciding to stay outside one night. As the narrator puts it, Mr. Pontellier “could not see that she was becoming herself and daily casting aside that fictitious self which we assume like a garment with which to appear before the world” (133).

Edna expresses herself through her art, and starts using members of the household as her subjects. Artistic expression in this novel is associated with individuality and freedom of emotion, and Edna’s devotion to her work implies a freeing of her soul. While she paints, she sometimes sings part of a song Robert sang to her. Music is another form of expression, but this song holds a certain significance. Robert complicated Edna’s life and helped to jumpstart her change of heart, and she is clearly still caught up on him. Singing the song reminds her of her time with him on the bay. Additionally, the words Edna sings are important. “Si tu savais” translates to “if you knew” or “if you only knew”. When Robert sang to Edna, it is likely he was thinking of his affection for her. Now, Edna is consumed, at least subconsciously, by thoughts of Robert and her own affections for him. However, neither are necessarily aware of the other’s feelings at the time each of them are singing. If they’d only known, perhaps something might have come from it.

The chapter ends with an explanation that Edna has happy days filled with dreams, discovery, and an appreciation for life itself; and that she has unhappy days comprised of an indifference to living, when life feels “like a grotesque pandemonium and humanity like worms struggling blindly toward inevitable annihilation” (135). The sharp contrast between Edna’s days are indicative of an underlying discontent. Although Edna may find an escape through her art, it is not enough to prevent overwhelming negative thoughts from ruining entire days.

The depressing end to the chapter suggests a slight depression within Edna herself. Sure, she may have some particularly happy times, but at the end of the day the particularly bad times persist.

Throughout this chapter, we explore Edna’s growth of independence as well as take a closer look at her relationship with Robert. At the start of this chapter, we see Edna go through a wave of emotions while in church. She has the heavy feeling of being oppressed and becoming more and more drowsy by the second, so much so that she needs to leave the service. As she is leaving, it is important to note that the lady in black also happens to be at the same service which shows how death is somehow always within reach of Edna. Following right behind her is Robert, almost as if he was a loyal dog to Edna. This is a callback to chapter five where Robert confesses that he has acted this way before for other women.

After leaving the service, Robert took her to Madame Antoine’s cottage where the only sound was “…the voice of the sea whispering through the reeds that grew in the saltwater pools” (Pg 97).  Throughout the novel, the ocean seems to be calling to Edna, which symbolizes the change or perhaps the rebirth of her life. It’s also important to mention that whenever the sea is mentioned, she is with Robert a majority of the time.

Once arriving at Madame Antoine’s cottage, Edna was able to have some time for herself, which seemed to be a new experience for her ever since her marriage and having children. While relaxing in bed, she started to observe herself “…as if it were something she saw for the first time” (Pg 99). This represents how Edna is starting to take a new form but doesn’t recognize herself. After examining herself, Edna fell asleep and when she awoke, she couldn’t hear anyone and thought everybody had left. She soon realized that Robert had not left her. Before meeting Robert down in the shed, Edna was able to have time for herself. Edna had taken the time to clean herself up rather than rush to be at Robert’s side immediately, which shows how she is starting to become independent from societal norms and putting a man’s needs first.

After her time in the bathroom, she met Robert at the shed where they exchanged some flirty banter. Robert explained to Edna that even though the others had left for an outing that he would not leave her side. Robert had also prepared food for Edna by scavenging for food around the island, which is an intimate moment between the two of them. This moment was so intimate because Edna had not received this treatment at home. After eating, both Edna and Robert sat on the ground watching the sun set. During this time, Robert occasionally picked at the hem of her dress (Pg 102). This shows how the relationship between them is changing because in chapter five, Edna would have been repulsed by the idea of Robert playing with her dress, but because something has started to change inside of her, it is beginning to affect her relationship with Robert.

After the sun set, Robert and Edna started their trek back to their own cottages under the moonlight. Whenever someone leaves in this novel, it seems to be under the moonlight, which can symbolize Edna’s growth in her independence. This can be seen later in the novel when Robert is leaving for Mexico because he is leaving at 10pm under the moonlight.  In order to return back to their own cottages, Edna and Robert must cross the sea, which represents her change as a person by crossing the line and becoming more independent.

This was a very interesting chapter because this is where we see so many subtle changes in Edna’s behavior. It’s noticeable that Edna has grown to be more and more comfortable around Robert as well as being comfortable with being by herself. This deepens her relationship not only with Robert, but with herself as she starts to understand that she is going through a change.

The Awakening

As I read Kate Chopin’s The Awakening,  I found that it is not merely a portrayal of New Orleans as a backdrop but also an exploration of feminism and resistance against patriarchal norms, deeply intertwined with its setting. Through various literary elements, Chopin crafts a narrative that exposes the constraints placed upon women in the late 19th century, through Edna Pontellier’s journey. 

One striking example is Edna Pontellier’s awakening to her own desires and identity. Her dissatisfaction with the traditional roles expected of women in her society is evident when she reflects, “She felt that her marriage, her very life, as she looked about at it, was utterly commonplace.” This dissatisfaction serves as a catalyst for her journey towards self-discovery and independence, challenging the patriarchal structure that sought to confine her and women in America. The city of New Orleans, with its rich tapestry of cultures and traditions, provides a fitting backdrop for Edna’s rebellion. The mingling of Creole and American societies in New Orleans mirrors the clashing expectations and norms Edna grapples with.

Chopin also employs symbolism to underscore the feminist themes in the novel. The sea, in particular, which can be associated with ambiguity and discomfort at times, becomes a powerful symbol of liberation, comfort, and warmth. As Edna immerses herself in the waters, she feels “the foamy salt water upon her lips,” symbolizing her desire for freedom from societal constraints, including her role as a mother and wife. After reading more about this literary work, I learned that the distaste for the role of the mother that is heavily experienced by characters like Edna contributed to the controversy around the book during its time of release, which further proves the strong feminist ideologies presented throughout the story and their direction against the current of patriarchal societal standards. 

The female characters in The Awakening also challenge patriarchal culture in their own ways. With her unapologetic pursuit of artistic expression, Mademoiselle Reisz defies societal expectations for women. She asserts, “I would give my life for my children, but I wouldn’t give myself.” Her commitment to her art exemplifies the sacrifices women were often required to make and the autonomy they yearned for. Additionally, Edna’s friendships with women like Adele Ratignolle and Mademoiselle Reisz demonstrate the complex relationships women had with one another in a patriarchal society. They serve as both sources of support and, in some cases, enablers of societal norms.



Gottschalk, Le Bananier

Screenshot 2023-08-23 at 8.13.41 AM

Louis Moreau Gottschalk (May 8, 1829 – December 18, 1869) was a New Orleans-born composer of Creole heritage. Here’s how the Wikipedia entry of his biography begins:

He had six brothers and sisters, five of whom were half-siblings by his father’s biracial mistress.[2] His family lived for a time in a tiny cottage at Royal and Esplanade in the Vieux Carré. Louis later moved in with relatives at 518 Conti Street; his maternal grandmother Bruslé and his nurse Sally were both Saint Dominican Creoles. He was therefore exposed to a variety of musical traditions, and played the piano from an early age. He was soon recognized as a prodigy by the New Orleans bourgeois establishment, making his informal public debut in 1840 at the new St. Charles Hotel.

This composition, “Le Bananier” (The Banana Tree)  was based on a Creole folk melody.

The Awakening

While reading The Awakening, I noticed that family dynamics seemed to play a huge role in the development of the characters and how they interacted with one another. One quote that really stood out to me was,  “If it was not a mother’s place to look after children, whose on earth was it? He himself had his hands full with her brokerage business. He could not be in two places at once.” This shows that at the time (and even still today) women were tasked with handling the children. Mr. Pontellier seems to embrace fatherhood more than his wife appears to embrace motherhood, which seems to almost frustrate him. I think as the story goes on we begin to see Mrs. Pontellier as a young woman rather than a mother. I believe she loves her children but may feel overwhelmed by the prospect of them, as seen when she is crying on the porch as her family sleeps. This disconnect also seems to place some strain on her marriage as her husband wishes for her to be more motherly. We also see how her relationship with her sons differs from the relationship between the other mothers around her. As mentioned, her sons do not come crying to her when they take a tumble, instead they dust themselves off and carry on. This is different from other women such as Madame Ratignolle, who was described as a mother-woman who took pride in her children and even her “duty” to have children. Edna acknowledges the fact that she is not a mother-woman, but being the wife of a creole, she feels like an outsider within her community because of it.

The Awakening

While reading The Awakening by Kate Chopin, one recurring theme that stood out to me is how Mr. Pontellier regularly sees and treats Edna and their children as one of his prized possessions. Léonce is a businessman who is always deeply preoccupied with his work, often away from home. Even at the beginning of the novel, when the family is at Grand Isle, Léonce would often leave for business or to the club. When he returned from the club one night to find one of his sons with a fever, he wakes Edna to ask her about it, concerned in a way I read more as a child with a damaged toy than a concerned father. Back in New Orleans, when Edna first begins to neglect her duties as a housewife, he begins to worry about the societal expectations and repercussions of her actions, not why she left. Overall, while Mr. Pontellier is not an unkind man to his wife and children, he views them as possessions or trophies to display.

The Awakening

In reading the novel, The Awakening by Kate Chopin, I took an interest in Robert Leburn. His character is questionable because he has spent many summers in the isle flirting and spending his time with a different woman each summer even though they were married. He tries flirting in a way that is so blatantly obvious that he is implicitly referring to himself on many occasions — for example, when he talks to Edna about the ghost that returns to the isle every year waiting for a woman to win his heart. He also does not follow through on anything he says he will, as is the case in his money-making trip to Mexico. When he does genuinely realize that he is in love with Edna and he returns to New Orleans, he still can not be true to himself because he is afraid of what the social and personal consequences will be if they are truly together. Overall, I question him as a person but I think that was the goal that Kate Chopin had in writing him.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »